Intrusion Detection System Analysis on Embedded Devices to Alert Kerberos Server Intrusion

Main Article Content

Auttapon Pomsathit

Abstract

Research into Intrusion detection on embedded devices for the purpose of alerting to Kerberos server intrusion. The research examines network intrusions in which intruders assault the system. To evaluate the performance of Kerberos against three distinct denial-of-service attacks—SYN Flood, UDP Flood, and ICMP Flood—we ran benchmarks against Kerberos server assaults. A Snort invasion detection capability is deployed on both the embedded Raspberry Pi and the server. Performance verification was accomplished through the use of a shell script approach that required 120 seconds for each experiment, recorded the experiment every 5 seconds, and examined the processor resource numbers. Primary memory and network connectivity However, placing the server on the network map disables firewalls and other types of protection. The network intrusion detection system runs on the Linux operating system and is based on the Snort application. 1. The consequence of an attack via the Kerberos server's internal communication consumes on average 1.08 times the resources of external communication. 2. A TCP Flood attack's consequences UDP Flood and ICMP Flood are 1.02 and 1.24 times more powerful, respectively. As can be observed, the detection of TCP Flood and UDP Flood assaults is similar, although ICMP Flood consumes the fewest resources. Intrusion detection in embedded devices using wired connections consumes an average of 2.28 times as many resources as wireless intrusion detection. The average overall resource use is 1.16 times that of the external environment. It has 1.28 and 1.15 times the CPU and RAM resources of a standalone Kerberos server for detecting Raspberry Pi incursions, respectively. Intrusion detection on Raspberry Pi devices significantly lowers the cost of resources consumed by Kerberos servers equipped with intrusion detection systems. It does not interfere with the Kerberos server's functioning.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pomsathit, A. (2026). Intrusion Detection System Analysis on Embedded Devices to Alert Kerberos Server Intrusion. The Golden Teak : Science and Technology Journal (GTSJ.), 9(2), 29–42. retrieved from https://li02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/gts/article/view/1934
Section
Research Article

References

อรรถพล ป้อมสถิตย์. (2562). Enhanced Efficiency of Intrusion Detection Systems with Honey Pot in Cyber Security. KKU Science journal, 44(2), 384-397.

อรรถพล ป้อมสถิตย์. (2555). Effective of Unicast and Multicast IP Address Attack Over Intrusion Detection System with Honeypot. ในการประชุม Asia-Pacific Advanced Network : APAN ครั้งที่ 33 วันที่ 13-17 กุมภาพันธ์ พ.ศ. 2555. เชียงใหม่ : ศูนย์การประชุมนานาชาติ โรงแรม ดิ เอ็มเพรส เชียงใหม่.

Auttapon, P. (2015). Performance Analysis of Intrusion Prevention System on Cyber Security for Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP). Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM2015) 21-23 September 2015(pp.780-784). Shanghai, China.

Auttapon, P. (2012). Effective of Unicast and Multicast IP Address Attack over Intrusion Detection System with Honeypot. 2012 Spring Congress on Engineering and Technology (S-CET), 1-4.

Alshami, I.H., Ahmad, N.A. & Sahibuddin, S. (2014). People effects on WLAN-Based IPS' accuracy experimental preliminary results, 2014. In 8th Malaysian Software Engineering Conference (MySEC), pp.206-209.

Arunanto, F.X., Djanali, S., Pratomo, B.A., Baihaqi, A., Studiawan, H. & Shiddiqi, A.M. (2014). Aggressive web application honeypot for exposing attacker's identity. In International Conference on Information Technology, Computer and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE). (pp.212-216).

Jianrong, Xi. (2015). A Design and Implement of IPS Based on Snort”, 2011 Seventh International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS), pp. 771- 773. Keith Harrison, James R. Rutherford and Gregory B. White., "The Honey Community: Use of Combined Organizational Data for Community Protection", 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 2015, pp.2288 - 2297.

Muhammet, B. & Resul, D. (2018, August). A novel honeypot based security approach for real-time intrusion detection and prevention systems. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 41, 103-166.

Pauna, A. & Bica, I. (2014). RASSH-Reinforced adaptive SSH honeypot. In 10th International Conference on Communications (COMM). (pp.1-6.).

Qian, G., Jie, F. & Nige, Li. (2015). The achieve of power manager application honey-pot based on sandbox". In 5th International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRPT). (pp.2523-2527).

T. Thakur, S. Dogra and Y. Sood. (2015). Replay Attack Prevention by Using a Key with Random Number in Kerberos Authentication protocol. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(7), 5616-5622.