Effect of Nesting Distance on Colony Weight of Stingless Bee Tetragonula laeviceps in Arabica Coffee Agroforestry, Ban Khun Lao, Wiang Pa Pao District, Chiang Rai Province

ผลของระยะวางรังต่อน้ำหนักโคโลนีของชันโรง Tetragonula laeviceps ณ พื้นที่วนเกษตรปลูกกาแฟอาราบิก้าอินทรีย์ บ้านขุนลาว อำเภอเวียงป่าเป้า จังหวัดเชียงราย

Authors

  • Cholticha Niwaspragrit Expert Centre of Innovative Agriculture, Thailand Institute of Scientific and Technological Research, Pathum Thani
  • Duangthip Kantha Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom
  • Wissarut Sukhaket Expert Center of Innovative Agriculture, Lamtaklong Research Station, Nakhon Rachasima
  • Phawini Khetnon Expert Center of Innovative Agriculture, Lamtaklong Research Station, Nakhon Rachasima

Keywords:

stingless bee, Tetragonula laeviceps, arabica coffee

Abstract

         Compare mean of the weight of T. laeviceps colony in all treatments which installing the nest away from the food source was 5, 10,15 m on August 2021 - January 2022 in arabica coffee agroforestry, Ban Khun Lao, Mae Jedee Mai sub-district, Wiang Pa Pao district, Chiang Rai province was found the weight of the T. laeviceps colony on August 2021 which installation distance treatments, 5, 10 and 15 meters was nonsignificant at 0.05 level, F = 1.28, Sig of F = 0.29 and Mean ± SD = 4.46 ± 0.55 kg, 4.87 ± 0.97 kg and 4.37 ± 0.63 kg respectively. On November 2021, the weight of the T. laeviceps colony in all treatments was nonsignificant at 0.05 level (p>0.05), F = 0.87, Sig of F = 0.42 and Mean ± SD = 4.41 ± 0.44 kg, 4.66 ± 0.93 kg and 4.23 ± 0.72 kg respectively. In addition, the weights of T. laeviceps colony from the distance treatments on January 2022 was found nonsignificant at 0.05 level, F = 1.12, Sig of F = 0.33 and Mean±SD = 4.29 ± 0.48 kg, 4.61 ± 0.96 kg and 4.13 ± 0.65 kg respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that installing nests at a distance of 5, 10, 15 m is appropriate to increase the size of the stingless bee nest. This is useful for farmers to choose the appropriate nesting distance for the coffee plantation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Layek U, Karmakar P. Nesting characteristics floral resources and foraging activity of Trigona iridipennis Smith in Bankura district of West Bangal, India. Insectes Soc 2018;65:117–32.

Barth OM, Freitas AS, Vanderborght B. Pollen preference of stingless bees Melipona rufiventris and M. quadrifasciata anthidioides inside an urban tropical orest at Rio de Janeiro city. J Apic Res 2020;59(5):1005-10.

Heard TA. The role of stingless bees in crop pollination. Annu Rev Entomol 1999;44:183-206.

Pinto da Luz CF, Fernandes-Salom TM, Lage LGA, Resende HC, Tavares MG, Campos LAO. Pollen sources for Melipona capixaba Moure & Camargo: An endangered Brazilian stingless bee. Psyche (Camb Mass) 2011;1-7.

Rasmussen C, Cameron SA. Global stingless bee phylogeny supports ancient divergence, vicariance, and long distance dispersal. Biol J Linn Soc 2010;99(1):206–32.

Jarau S, Hrncir M, Zucchi R, Barth, F.G. Recruitment behavior in stingless bee, Melipona scutellaris and M. quadrifasciata foraging at food sources differing in direction and distance. Apidologie 1999;31(1):81–91.

Inoue T. Foraging behavior of individual workers and foraging dynamics of colonies of three Sumatran stingless bees. Res Popul Ecol (Kyoto) 1985;27:373-92.

Jalil AB, Shuib I. Beescape for Meliponines: Conservation of Indo-Malayan stingless Bees. Singapore: Partridge Publishing Press; 2014.

Michener CD. The Bees of the World. 2 ed. Maryland: JHU Press; 2007.

Van Engelsdorp D, Brodschneider R, Brostaux Y, van der Zee R, Pisa L. Calculating and reporting managed honey bee colony losses, In: Sammataro D, Yoder JA. (eds.) Honey Bee Colony Health Challenges and Sustainable Solutions. Florida: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton; 2011.

Moretto G, Gonçalves LS, De Jong D, Bichuette MZ. The effects of climate and bee race on Varroa jacobsoni Oud infestations in Brazil. Apidologie 1991;22(3):197–203.

Atmowidi T, Pangestika NW, Kahono S. Additional nest structures and natural enemies of stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponinae). JSDH 2018;4(2):42-47.

Kumar MS, Singh AJA, Singh R, Alagumuthu G. Traditional beekeeping of stingless bee (Trigona sp.) by Kani tribes of Western Ghats, Tamil Nadu, India. IJTK 2012;11(2):342-45.

Basari N, Ramli SN, Mohd Khairi NAS. Food reward and distance influence the foraging pattern of stingless bee, Heterotrigona itama. J.Insects 2018;9(4): 138.

Downloads

Published

07-08-2023

How to Cite

1.
Niwaspragrit C, Kantha D, Sukhaket W, Khetnon P. Effect of Nesting Distance on Colony Weight of Stingless Bee Tetragonula laeviceps in Arabica Coffee Agroforestry, Ban Khun Lao, Wiang Pa Pao District, Chiang Rai Province: ผลของระยะวางรังต่อน้ำหนักโคโลนีของชันโรง Tetragonula laeviceps ณ พื้นที่วนเกษตรปลูกกาแฟอาราบิก้าอินทรีย์ บ้านขุนลาว อำเภอเวียงป่าเป้า จังหวัดเชียงราย. AdvSciJ [Internet]. 2023 Aug. 7 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];23(2):R143-R155. Available from: https://li02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/adscij/article/view/468

Issue

Vol. 23 No. 2 (2023): July - December 2023

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Advanced Science Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.